Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/6/1998

State v. Edwards

Citations

955 P.2d 1276
264 Kan. 177
1998 Kan. LEXIS 56

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding defendant “has the constitutional right to be present at all critical stages of the trial” as codified in Kansas by K.S.A. 22-3405(1
affirming conviction on direct appeal and remanding for nunc pro tunc correction of journal entry of sentencing
affirming conviction on direct appeal and remanding for nunc pro tunc correction of journal entry of sentencing
Explaining that a Doyle violation is when the State attempts to introduce \evidence that the defendant did not avail himself or herself of the first opportunity to clear his or her name . . . but instead invoked his or her constitutional right to remain silent.\
acknowledging that the holding in Batson was expanded by the United States Supreme Court in Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 415, 111 S. Ct. 1364, 113 L. Ed. 2d 411 [1991], to prohibit striking minority jurors who are a different race or ethnicity than the accused
defendant need not establish that he or she is a member of a cognizable minority group because the focus is on the individual rights of jury members not to be excluded on the basis of race or gender

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.