Skip to main content

State v. Tully

Citations

  • 262 P.3d 314
  • 293 Kan. 176
  • 2011 Kan. LEXIS 325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the interrelationship of errors is significant when the evidence against the defendant is not overwhelming
  • cumulative error analysis in which errors being aggregated included those that were constitutional in nature
  • “ ‘If any of the errors being aggregated are constitutional in nature, tire cumulative error must be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ”
  • appellate court examines errors in context of record as whole; court considers strength of evidence
  • combined effect of three errors deprived defendant of fair trial when evidence was not overwhelming
  • expert opinion beyond the witness' qualifications invaded province of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, Beier, Shepherd, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.