Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/19/2015

State v. Bolze-Sann

Citations

  • 302 Kan. 198
  • 352 P.3d 511
  • 2015 Kan. LEXIS 371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that failing to brief an issue results in a party waiving and abandoning the argument
  • holding previous statutory definition of reckless conduct that required \a realization of the imminence of danger\ meant State had to prove defendant knew someone was in imminent danger
  • challenging whether defendant acted recklessly because the State did not show she should have realized a particular danger or that the danger was imminent
  • \imminence\ did not need to be defined in jury instruction because the term is \widely used and readily comprehensible\
  • no record indicating defendant was present when court conferred with counsel about a written jury inquiry and written response
  • \We have never characterized a district court's failure to comply with the deliberating jury procedures provided in K.S.A. 22-3420 [3] or later statutes as a violation of the constitutional right to a public trial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, Stegall, Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Bolze-Sann

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.