Supreme Court of Kansas· 11/6/1976

State v. Mims

Citations

556 P.2d 387
220 Kan. 726
1976 Kan. LEXIS 533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the reasoning in its prior decision had been rejected and overruled by the United States 7 Supreme Court in Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S. Ct. 2240, 49 L. Ed. 2d 91 [1976]
stating that “where evidence disclosing another criminal offense has a direct bearing on and relation to the commission of the offense itself, it is admissible without a limiting instruction” because such evidence is “admissible independently of K.S.A. 60-455”
“Looking into a parked car through the windows does not constitute a search, even though it is nighttime and the items can be seen only with a flashlight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.