Skip to main content

State v. Kelly

Citations

  • 248 P.3d 1282
  • 291 Kan. 868
  • 2011 Kan. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that absent a showing of exceptional circumstances a court may dismiss a successive motion as an abuse of remedy
  • finding no \mechanism whereby the doctrine of res judicata may be circumvented to permit a relitigation of the plea withdrawal issue\
  • finding res judicata barred consideration of claim that a defendant previously raised, the district court ruled on, and the defendant did not appeal
  • unless the movant shows the existence of exceptional circumstances, the district court may dismiss a successive K.S.A. 60-1507 motion on the basis that it is an abuse of remedy
  • applying res judicata to postsentencing withdrawal of plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.