Skip to main content

Rowland v. State

Citations

  • 219 P.3d 1212
  • 289 Kan. 1076
  • 2009 Kan. LEXIS 1079

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling on direct appeal regarding a jury instruction did not foreclose ineffective assistance of counsel argument related to the same jury instruction in 60-1507 motion
  • noting that in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim that district court judge who presided over proceedings is \usually . . . in the best position to judge the merits of many such claims\
  • allowing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a first 60-1507 motion when the issue had not been raised on direct appeal
  • recognizing sua sponte power to remand in Van Cleave context
  • reversing and remanding for consideration of defendant's K.S.A. 60-1507 ineffective assistance of counsel claim because \claim did not receive the complete review it was due during his direct appeal\
  • reversing and remanding for consideration of the defendant's K.S.A. 60-1507 ineffective assistance of counsel claim because the claim \did not receive the complete review it was due during his direct appeal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.