Supreme Court of Kansas· 11/20/2009
Rowland v. State
Citations
- 219 P.3d 1212
- 289 Kan. 1076
- 2009 Kan. LEXIS 1079
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling on direct appeal regarding a jury instruction did not foreclose ineffective assistance of counsel argument related to the same jury instruction in 60-1507 motion
- noting that in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim that district court judge who presided over proceedings is \usually . . . in the best position to judge the merits of many such claims\
- allowing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a first 60-1507 motion when the issue had not been raised on direct appeal
- recognizing sua sponte power to remand in Van Cleave context
- reversing and remanding for consideration of defendant's K.S.A. 60-1507 ineffective assistance of counsel claim because \claim did not receive the complete review it was due during his direct appeal\
- reversing and remanding for consideration of the defendant's K.S.A. 60-1507 ineffective assistance of counsel claim because the claim \did not receive the complete review it was due during his direct appeal\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-08-05· cited 95×
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-06-19· cited 92×
- State v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2013-02-01· cited 90×
- Grossman v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-11-21· cited 85×
- State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-02-13· cited 77×
- State v. DullSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-01-31· cited 75×
- Thuko v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-12· cited 72×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-03-11· cited 68×
- State v. PottsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-06-24· cited 62×
- State v. StovallSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-11-22· cited 51×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2016-09-02· cited 42×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-07-03· cited 34×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-12-05· cited 23×
- Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-12· cited 20×
- Verge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-07-18· cited 15×
- State v. HerndonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2016-07-15· cited 15×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-03-01· cited 15×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-12-14· cited 10×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-09-25· cited 5×
- In re the Care & Treatment of LowryCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-06-08· cited 3×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 813×
- State v. Van CleaveSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-03-28· cited 230×
- Bellamy v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-07· cited 180×
- State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-04-23· cited 149×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-02-06· cited 107×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-15· cited 98×
- State v. NeerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-13· cited 74×
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-11-12· cited 72×
- State v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-07· cited 66×
- State v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-07-24· cited 64×
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-01-18· cited 60×
- Laymon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-11-10· cited 55×
- Moncla v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-03-05· cited 46×
- Woodberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-02-13· cited 34×
- State v. SwisherSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-04-28· cited 18×
- Rice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-03-30· cited 17×
- Maggard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-09-22· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.