Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/31/1997

State v. Rice

Citations

932 P.2d 981
261 Kan. 567
1997 Kan. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that evidence of previous abuse was admissible to show motive and intent as well as a “continuing course of conduct”
holding that the appellate standard of review of ineffectiveness claim is de novo
holding that the appellate standard of review of ineffectiveness claim is de novo
holding that the appellate standard of review of ineffectiveness claim is de novo
holding that the appellate standard of review of ineffectiveness claim is de novo
holding Whitten could testify as to statements made to Whitten by Frazier concerning things defendant told Frazier impheating defendant in the crime because Frazier was available for cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Davis, Allegrucci, Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.