Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/27/2007

State v. Miller

Citations

  • 163 P.3d 267
  • 284 Kan. 682
  • 2007 Kan. LEXIS 476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is the accumulation of multiple comments which may render them gross and flagrant
  • considering confrontation issue “ ‘necessary to serve the ends of justice’ ” in light of recent developments to the law regarding defendant’s confrontation rights
  • issue raised for the first time on appeal considered because \further discussion\ of the issue necessary to serve the ends of justice
  • Miller’s direct appeal detailing the allegations and affirming his conviction based on the issues raised
  • issue raised for the first time on appeal considered because “further discussion” of the issue necessary to serve the ends of justice
  • hearsay admissible under K.S.A. 60-460[a] if declarant previously testifies at hearing and is subject to cross-examination with respect to statement and its subject matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Luckert, Johnson, McFarland, Nuss, Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.