Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 299 Kan. 911
  • 329 P.3d 400
  • 101 A.L.R. 6th 663
  • 2014 WL 2900960
  • 2014 Kan. LEXIS 365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting facial vagueness challenge on grounds statute would be unconstitutional if applied to third parties in hypothetical situations
  • rule that general statute should yield to specific one is rule of interpretation used to determine which statute legislature intended to be applied in particular case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.