State v. Ashkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court’s error was harmless in part because “nothing in the defense theory called into question * * * any particular occurrence”
• state may be required to make an election at trial when it charges a single occurrence, but the evidence permits the jury to find “mul- tiple, separate occurrences” of the offense
• error held harm- less where the victim’s testimony was “primarily nonspecific and undifferentiated; although she identified some occur- rences at particular locations, most of the occurrences were described only generally, and without reference to a time frame”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).