Kohring v. Ballard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mandamus is appropriate when trial court had no discretion to deny change-of-venue motion
• holding that mandamus is appropriate when trial court had no discretion to deny change-of-venue motion
• explaining that “we examine word usage in context to determine which among competing definitions is the one that the legislature more likely intended”
• explaining that “we examine word usage in context to determine which among competing definitions is the one that the legislature more likely intended”
• noting that, because Webster’s focus is “descriptive” rather than “pre- scriptive,” it provides insight into how words are ordinarily Cite as 373 Or 475 (2025) 489 used
• noting that, because Webster’s focus is “descriptive” rather than “pre- scriptive,” it provides insight into how words are ordinarily Cite as 373 Or 445 (2025) 459 used

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).