Oregon Supreme Court· 6/19/2014

State v. Washington

Citations

355 Or. 612
330 P.3d 596
2014 WL 3330235
2014 Ore. LEXIS 480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

presuming that the jury followed the court’s instruction that attorneys’ statements are not evidence, where the prosecutor referenced uncharged violent conduct by the defendant
considering whether the record demonstrated that the defendant posed a security concern where the defendant was required to wear a “stun belt” under his clothing
finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision to require restraints
pre- suming that the jury followed the court’s instruction that attorney’s statements are not evidence, where the prosecu- tor referenced uncharged violent conduct by the defendant
reviewing similar security measure orders for abuse of discretion
“the use of physical restraints can impinge on the presumption of innocence to which a defendant is entitled and may also impair a defendant’s abil- ity to participate in his or her defense, such as by consulting with counsel or by taking the stand as a witness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.