Oregon Supreme Court· 6/3/2005
State v. Gibson
Citations
- 113 P.3d 423
- 338 Or. 560
- 2005 Ore. LEXIS 274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Article VII (Amended), section 3, of the Oregon Constitution requires a court to affirm despite any trial court error if there is little likelihood that the error affected the verdict
- reviewing the facts in the light most favorable to the state where the jury found the defendant guilty
- witness may not be impeached with respect to collateral matters, i.e., facts that have no independent relevance to the issues in the case
- witness may not be impeached with respect to collateral matters, i.e., facts that have no independent relevance to the issues in the case
- “A criminal defendant who assigns error to the exclusion or admission of evidence must establish that the error was not harmless. Moreover, Article VII (Amended
- “Article VII (Amended), section 3, [of the Oregon Constitution] requires an appellate court to affirm a conviction, notwithstanding any eviden- tiary error, if there is little likelihood that the error affected the verdict.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Balmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BowenOregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 58×
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 52×
- State v. McClellandCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-04· cited 50×
- State v. MaidenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 45×
- Purdy v. Deere & Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-04-17· cited 37×
- State v. TinerOregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 35×
- State v. PostonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-30· cited 33×
- State v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court· 2010-11-04· cited 30×
- State v. ZweigartOregon Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 30×
- State v. Rodriguez-CastilloOregon Supreme Court· 2008-07-03· cited 22×
- State v. AgeeOregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-03· cited 18×
- State v. SundbergOregon Supreme Court· 2011-02-17· cited 17×
- State v. KnightOregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-06· cited 15×
- State v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-16· cited 14×
- State v. WillisOregon Supreme Court· 2010-07-29· cited 12×
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-06-14· cited 12×
- State v. Vargas-SamadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-15· cited 11×
- State v. HaugenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-30· cited 10×
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court· 2007-02-15· cited 8×
- State v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-01· cited 8×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
- State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 143×
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 139×
- State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 125×
- State v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 107×
- State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court· 2000-09-14· cited 96×
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court· 1992-05-06· cited 73×
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 72×
- State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court· 1977-07-11· cited 70×
- State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court· 1983-05-10· cited 33×
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court· 1977-01-27· cited 22×
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.