Oregon Supreme Court· 7/25/2024

State v. Davis

Citations

553 P.3d 1017
372 Or. 618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, where “the primary or substantial value of the [evidence] was not derived from character, or character-based propensity reasoning, declin- ing to exclude the evidence under OEC 403 was within the permissible range of the trial court’s discretion”
concluding that, where “the primary or substantial value of the [evidence] was not derived from character, or character-based propensity reasoning, declin- ing to exclude the evidence under OEC 403 was within the permissible range of the trial court’s discretion”
holding that “because the primary or substan- tial value of the [other-acts evidence] was not derived from character, or character-based propensity reasoning, declin- ing to exclude the evidence under OEC 403 was within the permissible range of the trial court’s discretion”
noting that “OEC 404(3) is no longer technically controlling of other acts of a defendant in a crimi- nal trial”
explaining that “the applicable subsection of OEC 404 that applies to acts of a defendant offered in a criminal trial is OEC 404(4)”
noting that the court “mitigate[d] any unfair prejudice” by, among other things, “giving the jury a limiting instruction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.