Oregon Supreme Court· 5/20/1999

State v. Titus

Citations

982 P.2d 1133
328 Or. 475
1999 Ore. LEXIS 259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that evidence “either is relevant or it is not”
discussing State v. Hubbard, 297 Or 789, 800, 688 P2d 1311 (1984)
OEC 401 “establishes a very low threshold for the admission of evidence” (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
“A decision to exclude evi- dence under OEC 403 is reserved to the trial court’s discre- tion.”
“[U]nder Hubbard, the trial court’s error in this case would be harmless if either: (1) despite the exclusion, the jury nonetheless had an adequate opportunity to assess [the witness’s] credibility; or (2
“[W]e must review determinations of relevance for errors of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, and Durham, Justices

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Titus

18 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.