Arizona Supreme Court· 2/14/2008

State v. Harrod

Citations

183 P.3d 519
218 Ariz. 268
2008 Ariz. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “[a]l-though good character can be a significant mitigating factor, it deserves less weight in a ease involving a murder planned in advance”
finding no constitutional or statutory right to present residual doubt evidence during the penalty phase
affirming the defendant's death sentence when the sole aggravating factor, pecuniary gain, was weighed against the mitigating evidence presented
affirming trial court’s preclusion of residual doubt evidence during penalty phase of sentencing
declining to decide whether “§ 13-703.03 ... applies] to capital resentencings”
affirming trial court’s preclusion of residual doubt evidence during penalty phase of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, McGregor, Berch, Bales, Gemmill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.