Arizona Supreme Court· 3/24/1994

State v. Ramirez

Citations

871 P.2d 237
178 Ariz. 116
161 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
1994 Ariz. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying the public safety exception to admit a statement made in response to police questions aimed at determining what they would encounter when they proceeded further into apartment, past a body on the floor of blood-spattered room
defendant's expert concluded \with reasonable psychological certainty that the defendant's capacity ... was significantly diminished\
defendant's expert concluded \with reasonable psychological certainty that the defendant's capacity ... was significantly diminished\
“[A]lthough [courts] must consider all evidence offered in mitigation, they are not bound to accept such evidence as mitigating.” (alterations in original)
when jury appears confused as to legal issue, court has responsibility to give guidance by lucid statement of relevant legal criteria
when jury appears confused as to legal issue, court has responsibility to give guidance by lucid statement of relevant legal criteria

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corcoran, Feldman, Moeller, Zlaket, Martone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.