State of Arizona v. John Vincent Fitzgerald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating defendant “waived his privilege against compelled self-incrimination and any protections under Rule 11.7 by offering evidence relevant to his mental health during the second penalty-phase trial”
• stating defendant waives privilege contained in Rule 11.7(b)(1) by placing his mental health at issue; by doing so “defendant consent[s] to” admission of his statements “for purposes of [Rule 11.7(b)(1)]”
• stating defendant waives privilege contained in Rule 11.7(b)(1) by placing his mental health at issue; by doing so “defendant consent[s] to” admission of his statements “for purposes of [Rule 11.7(b)(1) ]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).