Arizona Supreme Court· 5/6/2011

State v. Prince

Citations

250 P.3d 1145
226 Ariz. 516
607 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
2011 Ariz. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that jury instructions and prosecutor’s correction of his own statements cured misstatements of law
observing that “ § 13-752(G) permits any evidence probative on [whether the defendant should be shown leniency], subject only to due process limitations”
holding 9 that the use of different juries in the aggravation and penalty phases does not violate a 10 defendant’s rights
allowing defendants to rely on \norm of first-degree murder\ instruction and argue it during closing
stating a defendant's expression of remorse is a non-statutory mitigating factor
no fundamental error where prosecutor argued that defendant’s bad temper was not sufficiently substantial to warrant leniency but rather “should be aggravation” where State was precluded from retrying aggravators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Berch, Bales, Brutinel, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

102 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.