State v. Harrod

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]l-though good character can be a significant mitigating factor, it deserves less weight in a ease involving a murder planned in advance”
• finding no constitutional or statutory right to present residual doubt evidence during the penalty phase
• affirming the defendant's death sentence when the sole aggravating factor, pecuniary gain, was weighed against the mitigating evidence presented
• affirming trial court’s preclusion of residual doubt evidence during penalty phase of sentencing
• declining to decide whether “§ 13-703.03 ... applies] to capital resentencings”
• affirming trial court’s preclusion of residual doubt evidence during penalty phase of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).