Arizona Supreme Court· 3/1/1983
State v. Gillies
Citations
- 662 P.2d 1007
- 135 Ariz. 500
- 1983 Ariz. LEXIS 171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a determination that a prior conviction involves the use or threat of violence requires an analysis of the statutory definition of the prior offense
- finding of pecuniary gain not proper where, even though money and credit cards were taken, defendant’s primary purpose was to eliminate the victim as a witness to her own rape
- noting the victim’s credibility “was of considerable importance” when there were no witnesses to the alleged crime
- finding (F)(5) aggravator not established when defendant confessed that purpose of murdering rape victim was to eliminate her as a witness to her own rape, not to steal credit cards and cash
- precluding the State from calling the victim of a prior crime to testify that it had been committed with violence on the grounds that the court would not “allow what is, in effect, a second trial on defendant’s prior conviction....”
- court remanded for resentencing after three of four aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge were invalidated on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Holohan, Gordon, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.