Arizona Supreme Court· 12/17/1992

State v. Salazar

Citations

844 P.2d 566
173 Ariz. 399
128 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 10
1992 Ariz. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the death-qualification issue had been waived, but “there is, in any event, no error, fundamental or otherwise”
holding that the general effects of alcohol on the human body and a person’s ability to reason are within the common knowledge and experience of a jury; as a result, no expert testimony is necessary to assist the trier of fact
observing that “[i]n addition to the lack of any applicable constitutional provision, no statute requires or suggests proportionality reviews in death cases”
noting that “no statute requires or suggests proportionality reviews in death cases”
noting that “no statute requires or suggests proportionality reviews in death cases”
noting that \no statute requires or suggests proportionality reviews in death cases\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moeller, Martone, Feldman, Corcoran, Zlaket

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

149 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.