Arizona Supreme Court· 8/9/2006

State v. Ellison

Citations

140 P.3d 899
213 Ariz. 116
485 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 44
2006 Ariz. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that superior court did not abuse its discretion when allowing admission of in-life photographs because they were “benign” when compared to post-mortem photographs
holding that evidentiary rulings by the trial court are generally reviewed for an abuse of discretion.
holding that mere speculation as to the declarant’s intent is not enough
noting that “[the defendant’s] childhood troubles deserve[d] little value as a mitigator for the murders he committed at age thirty-three”
reasoning that “childhood troubles deserve[d] little value as a mitigator for the murders [defendant] committed at age thirty-three”
stating that, absent fundamental error, a defendant may not complain if the trial court fails to sua sponte provide limiting instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bales, McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Hurwitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

98 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Ellison

78 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.