State of Arizona v. Gilbert Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the prosecutor’s “courtroom demeanor was inappropriate,” but deferring to the superior court’s “firsthand observations and assessments” as to whether such conduct amounted to “pervasive misconduct”
• noting the misconduct in Pool was “continuous and well-documented” and declining to reverse when misconduct was “confirmed only twice by the trial judge”
• noting court was “unable to find prejudice” without offer of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).