Arizona Supreme Court· 7/24/2009

State v. Moore

Citations

213 P.3d 150
222 Ariz. 1
2009 Ariz. LEXIS 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that proof of entering with intent to commit murder suffices to establish felony murder through burglary
holding that, where jury was erroneously instructed that actual reflection was not required to prove premeditation for first degree murder, the error was harmless with respect to a murder for which there was overwhelming evidence of premeditation
holding that, where jury was erroneously instructed that actual reflection was not required to prove premeditation for first degree murder, the error was harmless with respect to a murder for which there was overwhelming evidence of premeditation
stating that due process requires that a defendant be given “notice of the specific charge” (quoting Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196, 201 (1948))
stating the bifurcation of the sentencing phase into two different juries “is not substantively different from the bifurcation sanctioned under” Dann and Bocharski
finding any error in voir 'dire of prospective jurors harmless because they either were not empanelled or served as alternates and did not deliberate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bales, Berch, Ryan, Megregor, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

88 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.