Arizona Supreme Court· 7/25/2008

State v. Martinez

Citations

189 P.3d 348
218 Ariz. 421
2008 Ariz. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the Supreme Court has “never required de novo review of death sentences”
“In 2002, the legislature ended our independent review of death penalty verdicts for murders committed after August 1, 2002.”
“Pecuniary gain . . . need only be a motive for the murder, not the sole motive.”
“[W]hen a witness has continued reason to fear prosecution, the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to compel that witness’s testimony may be properly limited.” (citations omitted)
“We need not address this argument because the juror in question was not seated and [the defendant] makes no claim that any of the jurors who decided his ease should have been struck for cause.”
waiver found when argument fails to identify basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, McGregor, Berch, Hurwitz, Bales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.