Skip to main content

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 111 P.3d 369
  • 210 Ariz. 327
  • 451 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 2005 Ariz. LEXIS 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that photographs showing extensive decomposition, including skin slippage, bloating, and discoloration were relevant to “corroborate the State’s theory of the case”
  • holding that jury instructions that the lawyer’s statements are not evidence cured the prosecutor’s misstatement of the law
  • holding that a failure to object to alleged defects in an indictment before trial waived any objection after trial
  • holding that \use of a second jury during the aggravation and penalty phases does not constitute double jeopardy\
  • holding that mitigating evidence in a capital case cannot be rejected because it lacks a causal nexus to the crime
  • holding that jury instructions cured the prosecutor’s misstatement of the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurwitz, Jones, McGregor, Berch, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

122 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.