Arizona Supreme Court· 5/4/2005
State v. Anderson
Citations
- 111 P.3d 369
- 210 Ariz. 327
- 451 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 2005 Ariz. LEXIS 50
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that photographs showing extensive decomposition, including skin slippage, bloating, and discoloration were relevant to “corroborate the State’s theory of the case”
- holding that jury instructions that the lawyer’s statements are not evidence cured the prosecutor’s misstatement of the law
- holding that a failure to object to alleged defects in an indictment before trial waived any objection after trial
- holding that \use of a second jury during the aggravation and penalty phases does not constitute double jeopardy\
- holding that mitigating evidence in a capital case cannot be rejected because it lacks a causal nexus to the crime
- holding that jury instructions cured the prosecutor’s misstatement of the law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurwitz, Jones, McGregor, Berch, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court· 2006-04-26· cited 376×
- State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 257×
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-14· cited 207×
- State v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court· 2007-06-18· cited 202×
- State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-08-27· cited 191×
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2015-12-29· cited 154×
- State v. DannArizona Supreme Court· 2009-05-19· cited 146×
- State v. WallArizona Supreme Court· 2006-01-12· cited 133×
- State v. GlasselArizona Supreme Court· 2005-08-10· cited 129×
- State v. BocharskiArizona Supreme Court· 2008-08-08· cited 107×
- State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court· 2007-06-13· cited 103×
- Robinson v. SchriroNinth Circuit· 2010-02-22· cited 103×
- State of Arizona v. Joel Randu Escalante-OrozcoArizona Supreme Court· 2017-01-12· cited 102×
- State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court· 2008-04-21· cited 98×
- State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian BurnsArizona Supreme Court· 2015-03-10· cited 88×
- David Ramirez v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2019-09-11· cited 84×
- State v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court· 2007-06-29· cited 83×
- State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court· 2009-07-24· cited 81×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 2007-05-31· cited 79×
- State of Arizona v. Angelino Paolo Buccheri-BiancaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-10-30· cited 79×
Cites
122 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 2,827×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
- Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,965×
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,718×
- Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1980-05-19· cited 1,672×
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 1,649×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 1,617×
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.