Alaska Supreme Court· 12/29/1995
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 908 P.2d 1007
- 1995 Alas. LEXIS 156
- 1995 WL 764599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to decline to credit spouse for post-separation mortgage payments
- holding that while payment of fair market rental value for the use of marital property may be required under some circumstances, trial courts have discretion whether to give credit for post-separation payments to maintain marital property in property divisions
- holding that while payment of fair market rental value for the use of marital property may be required under some circumstances, trial courts have discretion whether to give credit for post-separation payments to maintain marital property in property divisions
- holding that while payment of rental value for use of the marital home may be required in some cases, trial courts have discretion whether to give credit for post-separation payments to maintain marital property
- affirming that default should be set aside when pro se litigant filed answer on same day default was entered
- affirming that default should be set aside when pro se litigant filed answer on same day default was entered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-06-28· cited 81×
- Veco, Inc. v. RosebrockAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 65×
- Knutson v. KnutsonAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-05· cited 51×
- Harrelson v. HarrelsonAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-02-14· cited 43×
- Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court· 1998-03-27· cited 42×
- Nicholson v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-26· cited 41×
- Berry v. BerryAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-04-16· cited 32×
- Stanhope v. StanhopeAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-08-09· cited 31×
- Stevens v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-10-14· cited 28×
- Hockema v. HockemaAlaska Supreme Court· 2017-08-25· cited 26×
- Brotherton v. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-07-18· cited 25×
- Northwest Medical Imaging, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court· 2006-12-29· cited 21×
- Richter v. RichterAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-08-01· cited 18×
- Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court· 2007-05-25· cited 17×
- Cook v. RowlandAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-06-21· cited 16×
- Sandberg v. SandbergAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-04-11· cited 16×
- Leis v. HustadAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-05-18· cited 15×
- Korn v. KornAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-05-10· cited 12×
- Batey v. BateyAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-03-07· cited 5×
- Hall v. HallAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-08-16· cited 5×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court· 1983-05-13· cited 139×
- Ogard v. OgardAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-04-05· cited 86×
- Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-07-26· cited 78×
- Lewis v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court· 1990-01-19· cited 62×
- Schanck v. SchanckAlaska Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 56×
- Ramsey v. RamseyAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-07-24· cited 51×
- Hunt v. HuntAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-04-19· cited 50×
- Wood v. CollinsAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-06-07· cited 48×
- Dixon v. DixonAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-12-24· cited 47×
- Betz v. Chena Hot Springs GroupAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-09-25· cited 38×
- Hertz v. BerzanskeAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-08-16· cited 35×
- Plumley v. HaleAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-05-04· cited 35×
- Sanuita v. HedbergAlaska Supreme Court· 1965-07-28· cited 26×
- Wanamaker v. ScottAlaska Supreme Court· 1990-03-02· cited 20×
- Bays v. BaysAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-03-15· cited 20×
- Williams v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-03-20· cited 11×
- In Re CookCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-12-16· cited 11×
- Thomas v. ThomasAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-08-09· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.