Alaska Supreme Court· 7/26/1991

Doyle v. Doyle

Citations

815 P.2d 366
1991 Alas. LEXIS 69
1991 WL 136758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that trial court has discretion to award damages for contempt, but that damages must correlate with actual injury to party
stating that issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered by this court
stating that the determination of whether to grant a “good cause” variance from the Rule 90.3 formula “must focus first and foremost on the needs of the children”
holding use of civil contempt not abuse of discretion}. We conclude that the contempt was civil, rather than criminal, in Part IV.B, infra. . Alaska R. Civ. P. 81(§. . See Crane v. Crane, 986 P.2d 881, 885 (Alaska 1999
affirming superior court’s award to wife of one-half of husband’s retirement pension accrued only during the years of the marriage
holding use of civil contempt not abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.