Wanberg v. Wanberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parties may indicate by their actions intent to treat property that would otherwise be considered separate as \joint holdings\
• holding that “[a]lthough [appellant’s] name never appeared on the title . . . it was an abuse of discretion . . . to shield the property from equitable distribution”
• holding that “[a]lthough [appellant’s] name never appeared on the title . . . it was an abuse of discretion . . . to shield the property from equitable distribution”
• characterizing as a marital asset pre-marital property used as a residence for some of the marriage
• non-owning spouse contributed by remodeling, redecorating, entertaining tenants, helping with general maintenance, collecting rents and accounts payable, paying bills, keeping business records, preparing information for accountants, and doing bookkeeping
• non-owning spouse contributed by remodeling, redecorating, entertaining tenants, helping with general maintenance, collecting rents and accounts payable, paying bills, keeping business records, preparing information for accountants, and doing bookkeeping

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).