Skip to main content
· 3/26/1999

Nicholson v. Wolfe

Citations

  • 974 P.2d 417
  • 1999 Alas. LEXIS 44
  • 1999 WL 164067

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding wife's limited help with bookkeeping and answering phone insufficient to support implicit finding of intent to hold husband's premarital business jointly
  • stating that \(aln equal division of the marital property is pre sumed to be equitable\ and approving the superior court's decision to begin its analysis with this presumption). 10 . Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546, 547-48 n. 4 (Alaska 1962
  • upholding denial of rehabilitative alimony when spouse “had significant education, skills, and experiences that would make him employable in several job markets”
  • describing abuse of discretion as relating to a QDRO: \Generally courts have approved of lump sum payouts where there are 'marital assets sufficient to satisfy the non-employee spouse's claim without undue hardship on the employee spouse.' \
  • \Trial courts have discretion to distribute retirement benefits to a non-employee spouse through either a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) or through a lump sum payout.\
  • parties may by their actions demonstrate intent to treat separate property as marital

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.