Skip to main content

Dixon v. Dixon

Citations

  • 747 P.2d 1169
  • 1987 Alas. LEXIS 332
  • 1987 WL 29824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that superior court need not justify its decision to award or withhold prejudgment interest
  • holding that superior court need not justify its decision to award or withhold prejudgment interest
  • remanding case for specific findings because spouse’s “vague education plans” did not support trial court’s award of rehabilitative alimony
  • remanding case for specific findings because spouse's \vague education plans\ did not support trial court's award of rehabilitative alimony
  • remanding case for specific findings because spouse's \vague education plans\ did not support trial court's award of rehabilitative alimony
  • policy inapplicable when marital assets fail to meet the needs of a divorcing spouse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.