Skip to main content

Hunt v. Hunt

Citations

  • 698 P.2d 1168
  • 1985 Alas. LEXIS 255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the superior court did not abuse its discretion for a three-year payout period
  • holding it was not an abuse of discretion in that case to apply the “special circumstance” exceptions to these pension benefits
  • ordering husband to pay wife for her share of business in equal monthly installments for three years at 10.5% interest
  • husband not required to give wife a security interest to ensure his periodic payment of her share of a business
  • no abuse of discretion in trial court using time of separation rather than time of divorce to value assets
  • case remanded to the trial court to specifically identify the reasonable needs of the children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.