Veco, Inc. v. Rosebrock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[causation sufficient to establish a prima facie case of unlawful retaliation may be inferred from the proximity in time between the protected action and the allegedly retaliatory discharge”
• noting that Alaska case law generally follows the Restatement (Second) of Agency but has eliminated the requirement in subsection (c) that the employee be managerial
• stating that the three-part framework used in Title VII cases has been adopted for discrimination claims as well as retaliatory discharge claims
• stating that the three-part framework used in Title VII cases has been adopted for discrimination claims as well as retaliatory discharge claims
• concluding discussion in previous case \was necessary for our holding\ and therefore not dictum
• concluding discussion in previous case \was necessary for our holding\ and therefore not dictum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).