Schanck v. Schanck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that interest earned on marital portion of plan is marital asset
• declining to specify when, as a matter of law, post-separation earnings become severable from marital property
• rehabilitative alimony is “properly limited to job training or other means directly related to the end of securing for one party a source of earned income”
• “[O]ur decisions have established a preference for meeting the parties’ needs with the division of property, rather than with alimony, where marital assets are adequate to do so.” (citing Bussell v. Bussell, 623 P.2d 1221, 1224 (Alaska 1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).