Ogard v. Ogard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that special situations may require use of valuation date other than date of trial
• concluding that valuation at the time of trial, the end of the joint marital effort, provides the most current and accurate information}. 29 . AS 25.24.160(a)(4)(I); see also Lewis v. Lewis, 785 P.2d 550, 555 (Alaska 1990
• noting that if the court chooses a different date than the date of trial, it should make “specific findings” to support that date
• explaining that property should be valued “as close as practicable to the date of trial”
• establishing that the date of trial is a proper time for valuation of marital property
• suggesting that special circumstances to justify imputing income under Rule 90.3(c) might arise if non-custodial parent liquidated income-producing assets and reinvested •them to avoid producing income in order to lower child support payments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).