Batey v. Batey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to “expand[] or alter[]” statutory definition to include putative marriages because AS 25.05.051 expressly intended “to provide a comprehensive marriage code for the state of Alaska” (alteration in original)
• calling this “[t]he essential basis of a putative marriage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Riddell v. Edwards
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2003-09-05· cited 25×
• Brandal v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2006-02-03· cited 15×
• Tong Vang v. Pa Kou Xiong
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2023-06-30· cited 5×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-03-03· cited 87×
• Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1988-05-27· cited 59×
• Borg-Warner Corp. v. Avco Corp.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1993-03-19· cited 56×
• Burcina v. City of Ketchikan
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-09-22· cited 35×
• Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-12-29· cited 34×
• M.R.S. v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-06-09· cited 20×
• Succession of Pigg
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1955-12-12· cited 19×
• In Re Marriage of Recknor
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-12-23· cited 18×
• Mary Spearman v. Viva Spearman
  Fifth Circuit· 1973-08-13· cited 16×
• Wright v. Wright
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-10-13· cited 14×
• Hernandez-Robaina v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1993-04-02· cited 11×
• Rosson v. Rosson
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-10-30· cited 10×