Skip to main content
· 5/4/1979

Plumley v. Hale

Citations

  • 594 P.2d 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that fairness may require that litigants who successfully urge the adoption of a new rule benefit from retroactive application of that rule
  • absent special circumstances, a new rule is binding in the case before the court and in all subsequent cases in which the point in question is raised regardless of when facts leading to the case occurred
  • absent special circumstances, a new rule is binding in the case before the court and in all subsequent cases in which the point in question is raised regardless of when facts leading to the case occurred
  • absent special circumstances, a new rule is binding in the case before the court and in all subsequent cases in which the point in question is raised regardless of when facts leading to the case occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Rabinow-Itz, Connor, Matthews, Dimond, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.