Alaska Supreme Court· 6/7/1991
Wood v. Collins
Citations
- 812 P.2d 951
- 1991 Alas. LEXIS 45
- 1991 WL 96062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that ousted domestic partner was entitled to half the rental value of the former couple's condominium for the post-separation period
- explaining that excluded cotenant who paid all of the maintenance costs was entitled to half of the rental value and credit for half of the maintenance payments
- agreeing with Beal that \[plroperty accumulated before separation should be divided by determining the express or implied intent of the parties\
- \We hold that the rules of cotenancy apply after separation when the parties no longer were maintaining a domestic relationship.\
- “[p]roperty accumulated before separation should be divided by determining the express or implied intent of the parties”
- “The right to reimbursement is an equitable right and recovery should be just and equitable under all the circumstances.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-06-28· cited 81×
- Lacher v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-12-10· cited 54×
- Knutson v. KnutsonAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-05· cited 51×
- Greenway v. HeathcottAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-02-15· cited 46×
- Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court· 1998-03-27· cited 42×
- Rausch v. DevineAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-12-05· cited 40×
- Brause v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-04-17· cited 39×
- Osterkamp v. StilesAlaska Supreme Court· 2010-06-25· cited 35×
- Rodriguez v. RodriguezAlaska Supreme Court· 1995-12-29· cited 34×
- Riddell v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-09-05· cited 25×
- Bishop v. ClarkAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-09-13· cited 24×
- D.M. v. D.A.Alaska Supreme Court· 1994-12-02· cited 21×
- Hatten v. HattenAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-05-31· cited 20×
- Hofstad v. ChristieWyoming Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 20×
- Dern v. DernMontana Supreme Court· 1996-11-14· cited 20×
- Matter of Estate of Dern Family TrustMontana Supreme Court· 1996-11-14· cited 19×
- Hertz v. ClearyAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-05-29· cited 19×
- Tomal v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-08-31· cited 18×
- Tolan v. KimballAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-10-19· cited 17×
- Sandberg v. SandbergAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-04-11· cited 16×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-03-28· cited 180×
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-11-27· cited 92×
- Carlson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-08-24· cited 80×
- In Re Marriage of BergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-12-06· cited 77×
- Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 76×
- Nordin Construction Company v. City of NomeAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-10-01· cited 66×
- Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-03-02· cited 58×
- Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-08-14· cited 56×
- Fairview Development, Inc. v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-10-09· cited 31×
- Foss Alaska Line, Inc. v. Northland Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1986-09-12· cited 27×
- Hartog v. SieglerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1981-04-14· cited 26×
- Horton v. HansenAlaska Supreme Court· 1986-06-20· cited 25×
- Dillingham Commercial Co. v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-08-16· cited 23×
- Carlson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-05-13· cited 23×
- Foster v. FosterAlaska Supreme Court· 1984-07-20· cited 23×
Other cases named Wood v. Collins
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.