Indiana Supreme Court· 11/15/2006

Reed v. State

Citations

856 N.E.2d 1189
2006 Ind. LEXIS 1021
2006 WL 3333813

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding rounds of gunshots that were fired a few seconds apart at two different officers in two different cars were a single episode
holding rounds of gunshots that were fired a few seconds apart at two different officers in two different cars were a single episode
holding appellate counsel ineffective when unraised issue was significant and obvious, stronger than those raised on direct appeal, and precedent was available supporting the unraised issue
observing that post-conviction proceedings do not afford a petitioner a “super-appeal” and that the post-conviction rules contemplate a narrow remedy for subsequent collateral challenges to convictions
providing that an issue known and available but not raised on appeal is waived
holding res judicata did not bar petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during sentencing because post-conviction claim was not “using different language to rephrase an issue that was adversely decided on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

154 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.