Skip to main content

Mitchell v. State

Citations

  • 946 N.E.2d 640
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 599
  • 2011 WL 1312293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Ind. Evid. Rule 201(b)(5)10 allows a post-conviction court to judicially notice the transcript of the evidence from the petitioner’s underlying criminal proceedings, and noting that the Ind. Evid. Rule 201(b
  • panel unable to address Mitchell’s claim of ineffective assistance; Mitchell did not present trial record during post-conviction hearing
  • no reversible error where trial court denied petition for post-conviction relief before deadline for submitting proposed findings and conclusions had expired
  • pcr court may take judicial notice of transcript of evidence from original proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Baker, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.