Kubsch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to present all possible impeachment evidence against a key State’s witness
• holding trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to present all possible impeachment evidence against a key State‟s witness
• providing that in order to prove ineffective assistance of counsel due to the failure to object, the petitioner must prove that an objection would have been sustained
• listing nine requirements a petitioner seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence must show
• finding counsel was not ineffective in failing to present evidence of an answering machine tape where a series of inferences were required to support the theory of the defense
• “[T]he method of impeaching witnesses is a tactical decision and a matter of trial strategy that does not amount to ineffective assistance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).