Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 861 N.E.2d 1182
  • 2007 Ind. LEXIS 101
  • 2007 WL 588990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding sexual acts against two different victims that took place five minutes apart in the same location were a single episode of criminal conduct
  • finding that, after appellate counsel testified that he did not read the record of trial proceedings that preceded the defendant's pleading guilty, appellate counsel did not employ a strategy and performed deficiently
  • holding sexual acts against two different victims that took place five minutes apart in the same location Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-2834 | June 5, 2020 Page 9 of 11 were a single episode of criminal conduct
  • Reviewing a prior Indiana Court of Appeals case, Harris v. State, 749 N.E.2d 57 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001
  • revising the defendant’s sentence to thirty years, which was the advisory sentence for the next highest felony, where the two crimes committed in the course of a single episode
  • omission of entire trial transcript, which was only source of evidence that the defendant committed crimes during a single episode to justify revising consecutive sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.