Indiana Supreme Court· 5/19/2000

State v. Holmes

Citations

728 N.E.2d 164
2000 Ind. LEXIS 450
2000 WL 656799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the doctrine of res judicata prevents the repetitious litigation of that which is essentially the same dispute
stating that as a general rule, when this Court decides an issue on direct appeal, the doctrine of res judicata applies, thereby precluding its review in post-conviction proceedings
noting that on review of a negative judgment, the question “is whether there is no way the court could have reached its decision.”
“The doctrine of res judicata prevents the repetitious litigation of that which is essentially the same dispute.”
issues available but not presented on direct appeal are forfeited on post-conviction review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.