Skip to main content

Fisher v. State

Citations

  • 810 N.E.2d 674
  • 2004 Ind. LEXIS 538
  • 2004 WL 1352847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel cannot be held ineffective for failing to anticipate or effectuate a change in existing law
  • holding that the post-conviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses
  • holding that an issue was both significant and obvious, as well as stronger than the other issues raised by appellate counsel on direct appeal, “precisely because the law in this area was unsettled and in a state of flux”
  • providing that the post-conviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses
  • providing that the post-conviction court is the sole judge of the credibility of the witnesses
  • stating the post-conviction court is the sole judge of witness credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

240 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.