Indiana Supreme Court· 2/19/1999
Williams v. State
Citations
- 706 N.E.2d 149
- 1999 Ind. LEXIS 67
- 1999 WL 80879
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that a petitioner’s failure to satisfy either prong will cause the ineffective assistance of counsel claim to fail
- providing that a petitioner’s failure to satisfy either prong will cause the ineffective assistance of counsel claim to fail
- providing that a failure to prove prejudice will cause a claim of ineffective assistance to fail
- holding even if defendant’s trial attorneys would have more thoroughly investigated blood evidence, they would not have been able to present information to the jury significantly different from that provided by the State’s witnesses
- finding no ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to renew motion for severance after pretrial denial of motion and no specific factual allegations to put trial court on notice of any mutually antagonistic defenses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby, Boehm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-08-20· cited 787×
- Lambert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-05· cited 456×
- Pruitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-03-31· cited 450×
- Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-11-15· cited 249×
- French v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-11-22· cited 246×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-01-17· cited 186×
- Grinstead v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 170×
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-06-20· cited 162×
- Allen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-06-29· cited 137×
- Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-11-08· cited 121×
- Morgan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-10-05· cited 98×
- Brightman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-11-15· cited 84×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-02-23· cited 84×
- Wentz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-15· cited 77×
- Trueblood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-09· cited 67×
- Godby v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-06-04· cited 54×
- Shanabarger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-05-03· cited 51×
- Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-05-04· cited 48×
- Graves v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-03-16· cited 45×
- Whatley v. TerrySupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-10-06· cited 37×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 1,617×
- Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 1,326×
- Stringer v. BlackSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 682×
- Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-11-23· cited 285×
- Weatherford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-08-31· cited 251×
- Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 156×
- Lowery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-10-04· cited 141×
- Roche v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-30· cited 125×
- Canaan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 120×
- Games v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-23· cited 117×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-30· cited 110×
- Cook v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-23· cited 88×
- Matheney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-11-24· cited 70×
- Douglas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-04-24· cited 68×
- Adams ex rel. Adams v. City of Fort WorthSupreme Court· 1995-11-27· cited 67×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.