Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 706 N.E.2d 149
  • 1999 Ind. LEXIS 67
  • 1999 WL 80879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that a petitioner’s failure to satisfy either prong will cause the ineffective assistance of counsel claim to fail
  • providing that a petitioner’s failure to satisfy either prong will cause the ineffective assistance of counsel claim to fail
  • providing that a failure to prove prejudice will cause a claim of ineffective assistance to fail
  • holding even if defendant’s trial attorneys would have more thoroughly investigated blood evidence, they would not have been able to present information to the jury significantly different from that provided by the State’s witnesses
  • finding no ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to renew motion for severance after pretrial denial of motion and no specific factual allegations to put trial court on notice of any mutually antagonistic defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.