Tedlock v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming consecutive sentences because the convictions did not constitute one criminal episode
• four sales of a particular illegal security to different victims not a single episode
• Defendant selling the same type of security to each of his victims in order to finance his scheme did not make all transactions one criminal episode

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).