Indiana Supreme Court· 10/19/2004

Lee v. State

Citations

816 N.E.2d 35
2004 Ind. LEXIS 898
2004 WL 2340643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, once a sentence has been served, “‘the issue of the validity of the sentence is rendered moot’”
concluding that illegal sentencing provision in plea agreement did not eviscerate entire plea agreement
holding that once sentence is served, the issue of its validity is rendered moot
holding that Lee could not complain of illegal consecutive sentences that were part of a plea agreement in which the 9 State dismissed the habitual offender allegation, allowing Lee to avoid an additional thirty- year term
noting that if one part of a plea agreement is void for illegality, courts generally enforce the rest
noting that if one part of a plea agreement is void for illegality, courts generally enforce the rest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.