Indiana Supreme Court· 11/27/2007

Overstreet v. State

Citations

877 N.E.2d 144
2007 Ind. LEXIS 1041
2007 WL 4171080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that counsel will not be deemed ineffective for failing to anticipate or effectuate a change in the existing law
holding that trial counsel’s performance should not he deemed deficient because counsel failed to anticipate that the prohibition against shackling defendants during the guilt/innocence phase would he extended in Deck, id., to the sentencing phase
holding that “in order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance due to the failure to object, the defendant must show an objection would have been sustained if made.”
finding that defendant failed to show deficient performance by counsel for failing to object or move the trial court to disallow spectators from wearing buttons
stating that to prevail on claim of ineffective assistance due to failure to object to evidentiary harpoon, defendant must show objection would have been sustained if made
holding “in order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance due to the failure to object, the defendant must show an objection would have been sustained if made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

87 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.