Indiana Court of Appeals· 8/6/2008

Williams v. State

Citations

891 N.E.2d 621
2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 2526
2008 WL 3009682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant waived Rule 7(B) argument where he did not present a cogent argument that his sentence was inappropriate in light of his character
stating that the appellant must demonstrate that his sentence is inappropriate with respect to both the nature of his offense and the nature of his character
stating that revision of a sentence under Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B) requires the appellant to demonstrate that his sentence is inappropriate in light of both the nature of his offenses and his character
explaining that, under Blakely, a sentence may only be enhanced based on: (1) prior convictions, (2) facts found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, (3) facts admitted by the defendant, or (4
stating that revision of a sentence under Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B) requires the appellant to demonstrate that his sentence is inappropriate in light of both the nature of his offenses and his character
observing that “revision of a sentence under Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B) requires the appellant to demonstrate that his sentence is inappropriate in light of both the nature of his offenses and his character”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Darden, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

137 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.